Viewpoints
Response to "Wiretapping
Controversy"
By Mark Neckameyer
January 08, 2006
Sunday
Liberal Democrats are so anxious to sling mud at President Bush
that they have no problem twisting the law and facts and even
seem ready to sacrifice a few American cities to get their side
back into power. This terrorism threat is getting very
serious with Iran having or at he minimum, being on the verge
of having the "A-Bomb". As Iran, Syria
and other terrorist sponsoring states despise us and everything
we stand for, they will like likely share a few bombs with their
Hazbollah friends as soon as they have them. We must stay
very vigilant and extremely tough. We can't tie the Administration's
hands now more than ever. Say we cut back on monitoring
terrorists and those who support them, help them, finance them
whether foreigners living here or demented U.S Citizens or whoever.
And suppose we lost Detroit to an atomic bomb attack, near where
the good Doctor practices. Think Ted Kennedy would put
down his drink long enough to blame President Bush for not being
tough and vigilant enough?
First off, the current administration is doing exactly the same
"eavesdropping" the same way as previous administrations
did including the Clinton administration. Guess why left-wing
Democrats criticize now and did not when Bill Clinton was in
the White House! Second, The FISA law was passed by Congress
authorizing judges to monitor the President. In our system,
the three branches; judiciary, legislative (Congress) and the
President, are equals and cannot take away each others' constitutional
responsibilities. The U.S. Constitution charges the president
with protecting us in time of war and Doctor Freedland, we are
at war! What if the President learned that terrorists were
about to blow up Juneau, took a request to wiretap the perpetrators
to a judge who said "no". What then? What
would the judge know anyway? He is unlikely to be
an international terror expert. This is executive
branch responsibility and not the purview of the courts
and that business about asking afterwards is nonsense ... and
is unconstitutional.
We wouldn't do it today but sixty years ago very liberal Franklin
Roosevelt interned all Japanese living here, U.S. citizens included,
at the outbreak of World War 2. The Supreme Court ruled
that FDR was acting within his authority under the constitution.
The government didn't know which individuals of Japanese extraction
or origin might be foreign agents so all were put into camps
... and we probably prevented some attacks here as a result although
some suffered. Don't like the arrangement today?
Take it to the Supreme Court. You are not going to bully
George Bush into dropping his guard and getting us all blown
to smithereens. There is no chance of that happening, thank
God!
The President isn't assassinating people who talk to Al Qaeda.
We just listen to what they are saying on the phone. Everybody
I have spoken with thinks this is a wonderful idea and I suspect
that Dr. Freedland probably agrees also but is taking the opportunity
to score some political points. I think this is a bad idea
in this time of war.
Mark Neckameyer
Irvine, California - USA
About: Mark, a frequent contributor
to our Opinion section, presently resides in Southern California
but has plans to retire to spend Summers on the Alaska coast
in two years. He has been an active volunteer in a variety
of civic activities including animal charities and MADD and he
has been a volunteer in his local Republican Party during elections.
Related Viewpoint:
Wiretapping
controversy By Robert Freedland - La Crosse, WI - USA
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Write a Letter -------Read Letters
E-mail the Editor
Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
|