|  Viewpoints
      Performing Arts Center By Lou Ann Richardson
 February 12, 2009Thursday PM
 I am writing to thank Mr. Dial for his recent letter to the Sitnews
      Editor and for his overall support of Borough funding of the
      Performing Arts Center with CPV funding. I did, however, want
      to correct some misconceptions in his letter, and answer some
      of Mr. Dial's reservations concerning parking for the new center.
 
 With all due respect, Mr. Dial's tone sounds defensive toward
      what he believes to be the "Arts Council", or maybe
      the city for the library issue, or maybe the borough for it's
      handling of the cruise ship tax fund, or maybe the performing
      arts center. Unfortunately, with respect to the performing arts
      center, he has either been misinformed or has made assumptions
      based on what he thinks he knows and understands about the "Arts
      Council".
 
 As a First City Players (FCP), board member, let me clarify that
      the performing arts center to which he refers, is not a project
      of the Ketchikan Area Arts & Humanities Council. It has nothing
      to do with the KAAHC. First City Players is leading this project,
      in conjunction with Ketchikan Theatre Ballet. The assumption
      that FCP and KAAHC organizations are one in the same is a common
      assumption/mistake often made, but we are separate organizations
      with different budgets, missions, and board of directors.
 
 The first misstatement by Mr. Dial: Mr. Dial's assertion that
      "the Arts Council and most of its members, who were extremely
      PRO-consolidation, may have a new building only because we did
      not consolidate", is a casualty of the assumption that the
      Arts Council and FCP are one entity. At no time, did First City
      Players ever take a position on consolidation. We are proud of
      a volunteer, audience and membership base that comprises the
      full spectrum of political opinion in Ketchikan, and so out of
      respect for all the people we serve, we avoid taking "sides"
      in matters of public politics, (that includes the library).
 
 As for the parking issue, Mr. Dial believes that FCP's need for
      the parking area across from the police station will put "the
      Arts Council, (actually FCP), in the uncomfortable position of
      being forced to take a stand on the new library issue. Dial states
      "Even if you assume that parking for this new facility is
      adequate, it is only so because of the parking lot across the
      street." In discussing parking for the new PAC, it is important
      to remember that by purchasing the Fireside, FCP is also purchasing
      the building s total allocation of 108 parking spaces from two
      Local Improvement District or LIDs: the Berth 2 LID, and that
      of Barney Way.
 
 Mr. Dial continues: "I would suggest that you not try to
      argue for a parking exemption claiming that the center will be
      used primarily during non business hours. To do so opens the
      borough's dedication of these funds to a legal challenge that
      they are not an appropriate use of the Cruise Ship Tax funds.
      As you know these funds must have a nexus to the cruise ship
      passenger who is in town primarily during business hours (they
      sail at night)."
 
 Mr. Dial is absolutely correct that the cruise ships sail at
      night, but it is also true that cruise ship passengers don't
      drive cars. Our LID is more than adequate for serving the staff
      of even the most ambitious of daytime programming for cruise
      ship passengers. Taken in context, we have only argued that parking
      demand for the art center will primarily be for our evening programming.
      This was the statement contained in our proposal to the Borough:
      The parking resources within 200 feet of the Fireside total 230
      spaces, not counting the proposed parking garage, the Main School
      site, the Methodist Church lot, and on-street parking. Even 15%
      of our LIDs 108 spaces are more than adequate to serve staff
      and our non driving daytime audiences. The 230 spaces within
      200 feet are more than adequate to serve our driving off-peak
      audiences.
 
 To make it clear, the activities that the center would be providing
      would occur in two ways:
 
 First, during the day to cruise ship passengers and other walk-ins
      with little to no parking demand (during business hours and thereby
      meeting the dedication of cruise ship tax money); and second
      in the evenings, during "off-peak", after business
      hours when parking is a non-issue.
 
 On behalf of the entire board of First City Players, I would
      welcome Mr. Dial, as well as anyone of the community to join
      us for our annual meeting at the end of February where we will
      be discussing the Performing Arts Center with our membership
      and giving tours of the Fireside building. Details will be appearing
      soon on our website at firstcityplayers.org.
      If that is not possible, we welcome any and all visitors to our
      FCP office located on the top floor of the Plaza mall to look
      at the proposed floor design of the Fireside remodel, or to call
      the office anytime at 225-4792 for more information on what we
      do and our hopes plans for a Performing Arts Center for Ketchikan.
 
 Lou Ann Richardson
 Ketchikan, AK
 
 About: "Longtime First
      City Players member and Board member. 25 year resident." Received February 10, 2009
      - Published February 12, 2009   Related Viewpoint: 
         Performing
        Arts Center By Rodney Dial
 Viewpoints - Opinion Letters: 
         Webmail
        Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
    Note: Comments published
      on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
       
      E-mail your letters
      & opinions to editor@sitnews.us
 Your full name, city and state are required for publication.
 
 
 
        SitNews
        ©2008Stories In The News
 Ketchikan, Alaska
 |