Viewpoints
Response to Squandered Inheritance
by Owen J. Graham
April 12, 2005
Tuesday
Dear Mr. Jackson your April
7th letter "To concerned residents of Alaska" was emailed
to our office. The letter questioned the log exports and sustainable
harvest practices of one of our members. I share your concerns
about squandering of public resources , but I think it is the
federal lands that are being mismanaged, not the State, Mental
Health, University or private lands. Consider the following points:
Log Export:
- About two-thirds of the current
timber industry employment is supported by the harvest of timber
that is mostly exported.
- The log exports are keeping
our Pacific Rim flitch customers in wood while our production
of sawn flitches from the sawmills is at its current low level.
- Four primary species of timber
grow in Southeast Alaska and in order to be competitive with
export markets, whether to the Pacific Rim or to the Pacific
Northwest, we need specialized mills for each species and type
of log (e.g. large high-grade logs, high-defect logs, medium
sized logs and small logs). In other words, we would need about
16 mills each processing a different species and type of log.
- Current log mills being built
in Washington State require about 120 to 150 million board feet
of timber per year. Some of the new mills we must compete against
process as much as 300 million board feet per year. The federal
government controls 94% of the land in Southeast Alaska. The
small amount of State and private land alone cannot support sixteen
large mills. Until we have an assured supply of timber from the
federal lands, we will have to rely heavily upon the export markets.
Sustainability:
- Neither the Mental Health
Lands Trust nor the University have adequate timberlands to sustain
a timber program with a non-declining, even flow timber harvest.
- The Forest Service has adequate
timberlands, but is only able to offer timber sales at a level
of about 10% of the pre-1990 level. The federal timberlands that
are not in wilderness, monuments or legislated roadless areas
will support about 1,200 million board feet per year, but the
1997 land management plan permits an average of only 267 million
board feet annually and, in recent years, the Forest Service
has been able to make available only about 50 million board feet
per year.
- In the millions of acres of
unmanaged federal timberlands, there are thousands of acres of
timber rotting away. This is not good land management.
Economic Realities:
- There were two bidders on
the last two Mental Health timber sales. Both bidders are known
exporters. No domestic manufactures bid on these sales because
they could not compete with mills in regions that have an adequate
timber supply to support a fully integrated manufacturing industry.
For instance, since the last pulp mill closed, we have no facilities
other than chip mills to process the low-grade timber in Southeast
Alaska.
- The Mental Health Trust timber
sales around Ketchikan will return about $12 million to the Mental
Health Trust and at least $23 million in additional economic
activity in Ketchikan. The local manufacturers cannot currently
return this much value to the Mental Health Trust and to the
community.
In response to your challenge
to legislate a ban on log exports, we suggest that a more responsible
course of action is to help us secure a reliable timber supply
that is adequate to support a fully integrated, competitive manufacturing
industry. This way, the mills will be able to purchase the logs
they need and the timberland owners won t have to sell their
timber at discounted prices.
By the way, the log yard picture
you enclosed suggests that the logs in that yard came from The
Earth's largest and oldest trees . That is not correct. You can
check with most any forester and get better information. We do
agree that the idle veneer plant is not a good thing. Alcan Forest
Products made a proposal to provide a 5-year supply of timber
for the veneer plant using the export values from either a Mental
Health Trust or a State of Alaska timber sale. Unfortunately,
the prospective mill purchaser was apparently dissuaded by threats
from groups that oppose logging. We presume you are not among
those who have been trying to dissuade potential purchasers of
that facility.
Sincerely,
Owen J. Graham
Executive Director
Alaska Forest Association
Related Viewpoint:
Squandered
Inheritance: A Challenge by Larry Jackson - Ketchikan, AK
- USA
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Write a Letter -------Read Letters
E-mail the Editor
Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
|