PLAN FOR TULSEQUAH CHIEF MINE CLOSURE AND CLEANUP IS MAJOR MILESTONBC Asks Bankruptcy Court to End Receivership Process to Pave Way for Mine Closure
August 16, 2020
“After more than 60 years of polluting a world class salmon watershed, two bankruptcies, four years of receivership proceedings and a lot of promises, we are finally seeing real progress toward mine cleanup and closure,” said Chris Zimmer of Rivers Without Borders. “We have some concerns with the closure and cleanup plan and as to how and when the plan will be implemented. But between B.C.’s strong demand to end the receivership process and the release of the cleanup and closure plan, there is real momentum toward ending pollution from the Tulsequah Chief.” “It is good to see B.C. recognize the widespread opposition to the Tulsequah Chief on both sides of the border and increasing demands for both an end to the long-standing acid mine drainage and a full closure of the abandoned mine. But this is by no means a done deal, and we urge Alaska’s leaders to protect Taku salmon by ensuring B.C. conducts a full cleanup and closure,” said John Morris, Sr., an elder of the Douglas Indian Association. “Way back in 2015, B.C.’s Minister of Energy and Mines said all the right things when he visited the mine site and promised to clean it up, yet we still have a mess,” said Rob Sanderson, Jr., Chair of the Southeast Alaska Indigenous Transboundary Commission (SEITC), a consortium of 15 sovereign Tribal nations located in Southeast Alaska. “It’s now encouraging to see B.C. starting to follow up on that promise. A successful mine cleanup here could build trust and good will between Alaska and B.C. to address other transboundary mining issues.” The receivership process has hindered B.C.’s efforts to take over the mine, stop the acid mine drainage and close down the mine. Both the Province and TRTFN noted in court that the mine owner Chieftain Metals and its main creditor, West Face Capital, have made little effort to halt the acid mine drainage, that no credible offers to buy the mine have been received during four years of receivership, and that the ongoing pollution violated Provincial and Canadian federal laws and mine permits. Both urged the court to end the receivership process to allow B.C. to take full responsibility for mine closure and cleanup. West Face asked the court to continue the receivership process indefinitely so that it could continue efforts to sell the mine. A decision is expected within a few weeks. “West Face made an ill-advised investment in a risky mine project that at the time already had one bankruptcy. They’ve had four years to sell the mine without any success, yet they want to continue that process indefinitely,” said Zimmer. “It’s clear the Tulsequah Chief isn’t a viable mine, economically, politically, socially or environmentally and there is no support in B.C. or Alaska for mine development.” The Taku River is usually Southeast Alaska’s largest overall salmon producer, with Southeast’s largest run of coho and king salmon, and is a vital regional economic, cultural and recreational resource. The Taku is the traditional territory of Tlingit people on both sides of the border. The Douglas Indian Association is the federally-recognized tribe in Alaska and the Taku River Tlingit First Nation is based in Atlin, B.C. Both have traditional territory in the watershed, and both have long been calling for closure and cleanup of the Tulsequah Chief mine. “For decades, Tribes, First Nations, fishermen, businesses, and others on both sides of the border have sought to end the Tulsequah Chief threat to Taku River salmon. It’s good to finally see B.C. make some kind of official progress,” said Frederick Olsen, Jr, Executive Director of SEITC. “But this is what “abandoned” looks like: taxpayers pay for the planning and cleanup of a toxic site, whenever that happens. Alaskans need to continue watching to make sure the Tulsequah Chief cleanup finally occurs.”
Edited By Mary Kauffman, SitNews
Source of News:
|
|||