Viewpoints
No to White Cliff Project
By G. J. Williams
September 09, 2006
Saturday
Dear Sitnews,
The White Cliff Project was initially begun in an effort to save
the 75 year old school building. The facilities that are to be
placed in the site are greatly needed and I support the intended
uses whole heartedly, I hope to use them myself someday.
There does seem to be a rush to save the building itself and
I have recently heard "no time like the present" and
I believe there is "no time like the present to take time"
at the beginning of the project to thoroughly re-evaluate the
proposed project as it stands and DO IT RIGHT. Why is this building
now sound enough to put a beginning estimated price tag of $14
million dollars into when it was not sound or cost effective
enough to bring it up to code in the preceding years?
Regarding this subject I feel we need to recognize the natural
flow of the lifecycle. We will have young and agile dancers,
all the folks in between and seniors with special needs using
this facility. The lifecycle of the property itself needs to
be acknowledged and allow the building to finish its days with
honor and affection. The legacy and heritage of the White Cliff
School can be attained in a deep and meaningful tribute without
remodeling the existing building. Build a completely new building;
preserve the facade and place it in one of the lobbies, use the
cornerstone to build on anew or place it in one of the lobbies,
integrate all the artifacts such as doors, moldings, the staircase
and anything else that bespeaks of the old building into the
new building. Include tiles with the names of all the people
who populated the building over time, list them in family groups
when possible and allow people in the community to purchase/contribute
to these but include everyone here and gone. Adding the library
to the plans is another great use to include.
As I understand it the cost to demolish the present building
will cost $4 million dollars, how much will it cost to remove
the same hazardous materials and what other obstacles will be
found as this is done? My uneducated guess at what hazardous
materials may be present and of issue are; lead paint, lead pipes,
and asbestos which require a specially licensed company and much
containment to remove either by demolition or remodel. Will the
cost be the same $4 million or more? Is the community willing
to save this present building at all costs ? The Schoenbar remodel
has been a disaster that is being paid for twice and is not yet
in use, (every student currently in K-HI and middle school has
never been schooled in Schoenbar) is the community ready to take
on another remodel of even greater proportions and costs?
The architectural company currently involved specializes in saving
old buildings - nothing is stated about them specializing in
senior facilities or large multi-use public spaces of this scale.
This should be a huge heads up to the community to take into
account the state and local laws and building requirements for
licensing of a senior facility and public spaces. I don't believe
the $14 million dollar price tag is realistic and the idea that
changes can be incorporated along the way does not bode well.
How would this project be affected if we vote on consolidation
and it passes before voting on the tax issue to pay for this
remodel on the October 3rd ballot? The ballot as it reads is
to fund the remodel of the existing 75 year old building. Ballot
Measure Proposition One, Ordinance # 1403 see section B, G(1),
I, J, Section 3(d) and Section 4. There are a variety of phrases
and words used in reference to White Cliff school-building-property-center,
well, which one are we really voting on? I encourage everyone
to go to the web sites or find the information wherever available;
review the information and draw your own conclusions before voting.
I feel a NO vote at this time is a more thoughtful and responsible
vote. Let's give this project an opportunity to be done RIGHT
with a more detailed re-evaluation of the project. It just might
just save money and time overall for final completion.
White Cliff Project Web site can be accessed through their advertisement
on Sitnews (you're here anyway) or at: www.ketchikanarts.org/whitecliff
Architect Web site: http://www.welshwhiteley.com/
Borough Web site: http://borough.ketchikan.ak.us/clerks/election_information.htm
Sincerely,
G. J. Williams
Ketchikan, AK - USA
About: "Citizen, Voter"
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Send A Letter -------Read Letters
E-mail the Editor
Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
|