Viewpoints
Dangers of Investing Permanent
Fund in Hedge Funds
By Jim & Mary Lynne Dahl
September 26, 2006
Tuesday
To All Alaska Residents:
In November 2005 we wrote a letter to the Alaska State Legislature,
reprinted in Sitnews, warning of the dangers
of allowing the Alaska Permanent Fund to be invested in hedge
funds and private equity investments. In February 2006 and again
in March 2006, we again wrote of the dangers of hedge fund investing.
We got very few responses from any state legislators or senators,
causing us to assume that they either did not understand what
we were referring to or do not care about investment risks to
the Alaska Permanent Fund.
As a brief review, a hedge fund is a fund that uses complicated
and secretive methods of investing, usually very volatile and
higher risk techniques suitable for high net worth clients, called
accredited investors. Hedge funds are illiquid, do not publish
data about their methodology, returns or fees, charge very high
fees for investments in their funds and are highly leveraged.
Now, about a year after the Alaska legislature agreed to allow
the Board of Trustees of the Permanent Fund to invest in these
secretive, high risk hedge funds, the Wall Street Journal reports
this week on the crashing failure of one of the very largest
of the hedge funds, Amaranth Fund. This would not be so surprising
if Amaranth Fund was not such a huge hedge fund, but it was gigantic,
almost $10 billion in size, a month ago. Today, it is pegged
at less than half that value.
Amaranth Fund was supposed to be a multi-strategy fund, one that
reduced risks by being widely diversified, hedged against losses,
cautiously managed by conservative traders. It was sold as being
a disciplined relative-value fund . Because hedge fund management
is secretive, it did not become known until just this week that
this fund was not diversified at all and not multi-strategy or
cautiously managed. It was, in fact, invested mostly in energy
futures contracts which crashed, resulting in the Amaranth Fund
losing 65% its value in less than one month, according to the
September 22, 2006 issue of the Wall Street Journal. That amounts
to a loss of $6 billion, out of the total of over $9.5 billion
that Amaranth Fund invested on behalf of its clients, most of
whom are pension funds and large institutional clients.
The $7.7 billion San Diego pension fund had $175 million invested
in Amaranth Fund. 3M Company's $9 billion pension plan had slightly
less than $100 million invested. At around $30 billion, the Alaska
Permanent Fund is one of the largest public trust funds in the
world and had a whopping $732+ million committed to hedge funds
as of 6/30/06 (Alaska Permanent Fund published financial reports);
that's almost three-quarters of a billion dollars! Although Amaranth
Fund did not show up on the 6/30/06 list of hedge funds owned
by the Alaska Permanent Fund, it is very possible that one or
more of the 34 hedge funds it owns did invest in Amaranth Fund,
as this is common hedge fund practice.
On a broader note, why would the Alaska Permanent Fund even want
to risk investing in a hedge fund, anyway? With a stated Alaska
Permanent Fund investment goal of an annual total return of 5%,
wouldn t safer, more conservative, publicly-traded, fully disclosed
mutual funds, real estate, stocks and bonds be better? Why would
any sensible, prudent investor takes these kinds of risks and
pay the huge fees charged by hedge funds, when the S&P 500
s market average of around 11.6% (Ibbotson, 12/31/1994 to April
2006) was available with far less risky stocks and bonds?
The answer to why is that the Board of Trustees of the Alaska
Permanent Fund wants to keep up with the Joneses. They have succumbed
to envy, and have listened for too long to the guys in suits
from New York, who talk a mighty convincing story about multi-strategy
investing and modern portfolio theory and low correlation . Are
you getting the picture?.
Well, back to Amaranth; we now know how this fund operated, by
saying one thing and doing another; investors paid big-time for
the privilege of being lied to. It lost 65% in a flash and is
scrambling now just to stay afloat. Amaranth is not the first
hedge fund to lie, or scam, or cheat. The US Securities and Exchange
Commission is investigating more hedge fund cases of suspected
fraud than it can probably handle, reporting over 50 suspected
cases last March of 2006. More hedge funds are closing monthly
than being opened, due to lack of performance and losses. Amaranth
Fund may only be the tip of the iceberg, but if so, it is very
significant tip, as it is a very large fund, with a lot of investor
s money now down the drain.
Let's hope that none of the 34 hedge funds in the Alaska Permanent
Fund investment portfolio were invested in Amaranth Fund. Let's
also hope that the Alaska legislature will wake up, review the
Amaranth Fund debacle and direct the Board of Trustees of the
Permanent Fund to get out of hedge funds and private equity investments
entirely. It just is not worth the risks.
Jim & Mary Lynne Dahl
Ketchikan, AK - USA
About: "Jim & Mary
Lynne Dahl are residents of Ketchikan, Alaska and have spent
over 20 years each giving financial planning and investment advice
professionally. They are partners in their own firm, Otter Creek
Partners, a investment advisor firm registered in Alaska and
Washington. Mary Lynne has been a certified financial planner
since 1984 and Jim is a former stock broker. They are very interested
in the long term fiscal health of the state and the prudent management
of the Alaska Permanent Fund."
Related Viewpoint:
Open
Letter: To the Alaska Legislature By James R. Dahl &
Mary Lynne Dahl
November 28, 2005
Hedge
funds and the Permanent Fund By James R. Dahl
November 28, 2005
Investing
public money secretly By Mary Lynne Dahl
February 28, 2006
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Send A Letter -------Read
Letters
E-mail the Editor at
editor@sitnews.us
Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
|