Viewpoints
Let's not vote for gridlock!
By Mark Neckameyer
November 04, 2006
Saturday AM
The United States is by far the most successful, prosperous,
powerful nation on the world stage today and it has been that
way since World War 2. It is tough to argue with success but
here goes;
Most all Democratic nations in the world use a "Parliamentary"
governing system. The political party with the most representation
in the legislative branch automatically is put in charge of executive
functions. In Great Britain for example, the majority party in
their House of Commons where all laws are passed, selects the
Prime Minster, typically the leader of that majority party. If
something urgently needs to be acted on by the government, the
Legislative branch and the Executive work together and the job
gets done quickly. Here in the US we have a Senate elected on
a six year cycle and our House of Representatives elected on
a two year cycle with our chief exec., the President on a four
year cycle with all having to approve of laws and programs before
they can be implemented. This may have worked well in a small
country two hundred years ago when our Founding Fathers were
trying to rein back the power of a central government but this
gridlock is an awful hindrance these days in addressing urgent
national problems; the "War on terror" for example.
When both our major parties are at war with each other, refusing
to pass legislation suggested by or approved by the other party,
to make political points, nothing gets accomplished and we all
suffer the consequences.
Our problem is that our government is too slow to react to changes
in the political will of our citizens. The Senate, a third of
whom were elected six years ago and a third who do not need to
run for reelection for another six years, may not represent the
will of the people of the US today. Nothing short of a major
change in our constitution can change all this very much but
we can resist the calls to elect Democrats this time "to
show the President we are angry about Iraq". This would
surely result in internecine fighting and showboating in the
halls of government as each party worked to establish arguing
points for the 2008 Presidential General election. Better where
possible to consciously elect a President and Congress of the
same party and if they do a bad job, throw them out together
next election. Otherwise both political parties play the blame
game; "The Congress did it" "No, the President
screwed up", etc.
Let's all vote for the best candidate next Tuesday and let's
not try to punish the President by elected his critics to Congress
because of screwball, unforeseeable acts of the Muslim extremists
who have been uncontrollable since, oh maybe 650AD or so.
Mark Neckameyer
Irvine, CA
About: "I am a semi retired accountant living in California.
I love Alaska for the fishing and outdoor lifestyle and am about
a year away from full retirement; plannng to spend as much summer
as possible in Alaska."
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Send A Letter -------Read
Letters
E-mail the Editor at
editor@sitnews.us
Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
|