Viewpoints: Letters / Opinions
Boundary Waters Treaty
By Frederick Olsen, Jr.
December 18, 2015
Friday PM
The United Tribal Transboundary Mining Work Group (UTTMWG) issued a letter to Alaska Governor Walker requesting that the Governor stop the process of developing a Statement of Cooperation with British Columbia on the SE Alaska Transboundary Rivers until his office formally requests the involvement of the US Department of State under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 to help protect the rivers vital to our economy and traditional cultures and way of life.
The UTTMWG represents 14 Southeast Alaska Native Tribes that have lived and prospered for centuries in relationship with our rivers and the fish and wildlife they support. Because our culture is forever associated with our land, our Tribal governments are more than “stakeholders” in the relationship between Alaska and British Columbia. We are the indigenous people of the land.
The Boundary Waters Treaty between the U.S. and Canada is designed to create a mechanism to avoid and resolve a wide range of water-related challenges at the watershed level that are anticipated as a result of the rapid development of mining projects in British Columbia. Through the formation of an International Joint Commission (IJC) under the Treaty, effective coordination of various institutions, communities, Tribes, and other governments can occur.
The Statement of Cooperation and related Memorandum of Understanding between Alaska and British Columbia is an inflexible document that is not legally binding, contains no funding for performance, is unenforceable, and ignores the presence of sovereign Tribal and indigenous governments on both sides of the international border.
The Boundary Waters Treaty has been used effectively for over 100 years and needs to be used here. We must use every opportunity to protect our environment for future generations. The US government needs to fulfill its responsibility to Tribes. As you read this, the Tulsequah Chief Mine currently remains out of compliance and continues to pollute the Taku River watershed. Another mine project—the Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell or KSM—plans to use similar technology as the disastrous Mount Polley mine but on a much, much larger scale.
The cultural survival of our indigenous citizens depends on our ability to maintain our cultural values, practice our ancient traditions, and control and govern our own communities. Our traditional values are inexorability linked to the land and water within now international transboundary watersheds. Our culture and communities depend on the maintenance of the clean water and water life these rivers provide to assure a strong economy and cultural framework for future generations.
This is not a local bilateral issue solvable through an unenforceable, not legally binding agreement. This is a multinational issue between State, Province, US and Canadian federal authorities, Tribal governments, and First Nation/indigenous governments. The Alaska congressional delegation, Tribal governments, municipalities, and Native organizations including the National Congress of American Indians, the Alaska Native Brotherhood, and the Alaska Federation of Natives have all recognized the need for truly meaningful international engagement. The Southeast Alaska Tribes must have the opportunity to guarantee the continuation and protection of our life and culture in order to truly exercise our sovereign rights. The IJC has over 100 years of experience avoiding and settling disputes between transboundary governments.
Further, the establishment of an International Watershed Commission under the Boundary Waters Treaty will provide opportunity for all parties to participate equally. It will make much-needed federal funding available and bring in more expertise. Even after a formal reference, though, the formation of an IJC action may take several years. Therefore, it is imperative that the State of Alaska act now. Further delay is unwarranted. Alaska will have many opportunities for input as the IJC process moves forward.
The UTTMWG does not oppose the type of agreement described under the current Memorandum of Understanding with British Columbia. However, an MOU or a Statement of Cooperation represents only one tool that should be used to protect our rivers and communities. We implore the State of Alaska to formally request that the US Department of State request a reference to the International Joint Commission to help resolve this issue prior to finalizing any other agreements.
We look forward to an expeditious decision on this matter.
Sincerely,
Frederick Olsen, Jr.
Chairman, United Tribal Transboundary Mining Work Group
Kasaan, Alaska
About: Frederick Olsen, Jr. is the Chairman of the United Tribal Transboundary Mining Work Group, a coalition of 14 Southeast Alaska Native Tribes and is the Tribal Vice-President of the Organized Village of Kasaan.
Received December 16, 2015
- Published December 18, 2015
Related:
Southeast Alaska leaders urging stronger international safeguards in shared watersheds
SitNews - December 10, 2015
Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:
Webmail
Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
Representations of fact and opinions in letters are solely those of the author.
The opinions of the author do not represent the opinions of Sitnews.
E-mail your letters
& opinions to editor@sitnews.us
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.
Published letters become the property of SitNews.
SitNews ©2014
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
Articles &
photographs that appear in SitNews may be protected by copyright
and may not be reprinted without written permission from and
payment of any required fees to the proper sources.
E-mail your news &
photos to editor@sitnews.us
Photographers choosing to submit photographs for publication to SitNews are in doing so granting their permission for publication and for archiving. SitNews does not sell photographs. All requests for purchasing a photograph will be emailed to the photographer.
|
|