Contact
News
Tips
Viewpoints
Search Sitnews
Copyright Info
Archives
Today's
News
Alaska & Ketchikan
Top Stories
U.S. News
U.S. Politics
Stock Watch
Personal Finance
Science News
US Education News
Parenting News
Seniors News
Medical News
Health News
Fitness
Offbeat News
Online Auction News
Today In History
Product Recalls
Obituaries
Quick News
Search
SitNews
Alaska
Ketchikan
SE Alaska
Alaska News Links
Columns
- Articles
Dave Kiffer
Arts
& Entertainment
Parnassus
Reviews
Jason Love
Fish
Factor
Bob Ciminel
Chemical Eye
On...
Rob
Holston
More Columnists
Ketchikan
Our Troops
Historical
Ketchikan
June Allen
Dave Kiffer
Louise B. Harrington
Recognition
Match
of the Month
Asset Builders
Kid's Corner
Bob
Morgan
Ketchikan
Arts & Events
Arts
This Week
Ketchikan
Museums
KTN
Public Library
Friday Night Insight
Parks & Recreation
Chamber
Lifestyles
Home & Garden
Food & Drink
Arts & Culture
Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
Celebrity Gossip
On the Web
Cool Sites
Webmaster Tips
Virus Warnings
Sports
Ketchikan Links
Top Sports News
Public Records
FAA Accident Reports
NTSB
Accident Reports
Court Calendar
Court Records Search
Wanted: Absconders
Sex Offender Reg.
Public Notices
Weather,
Webcams
Today's
Forecast
KTN Weather
Data
AK
Weather Map
Ketchikan
Webcam
SE AK Webcams
Alaska Webcams
AK Earthquakes
Earthquakes
TV Guide
Ketchikan
Ketchikan
Phone Book
Yellow
Pages
White
Pages
Employment
Employment
Government
Links
Local Government
State & National
|
Wednesday
January 10, 2007
Creek Street
Front Page Photo by
Carl Thompson
National: Bush
accepts Iraq mistakes, orders increase in troops - U.S. President
George W. Bush Wednesday evening took the blame for the situation
in Iraq, saying, "Our troops in Iraq have fought bravely.
They have done everything we have asked them to do. Where mistakes
have been made, the responsibility rests with me." He said,
"The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people
-- and it is unacceptable to me."
President George W.
Bush concludes his address to the nation Wednesday evening, Jan.
10, 2007, from the White House Library, where President Bush
outlined a new strategy on Iraq.
White House photo by Eric Draper
In a televised address to the
American people Wednesday, President Bush announced the deploymented
of five additional U.S. Army brigades to Iraq to support Iraqi
army operations in and around its capital, Baghdad, and two Marine
brigades to Anbar province to assist in operations against al-Qaida.
Bush said the political gains
made by elections in Iraq have been overwhelmed by sectarian
violence. He called for a new direction in Iraq policy to neutralize
al-Qaida terrorists and Sunni insurgents.
Bush said, " For the safety
of our people, America must succeed in Iraq." He said, "The
consequences of failure are clear: Radical Islamic extremists
would grow in strength and gain new recruits. They would be in
a better position to topple moderate governments, create chaos
in the region, and use oil revenues to fund their ambitions.
Iran would be emboldened in its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Our
enemies would have a safe haven from which to plan and launch
attacks on the American people. On September the 11th, 2001,
we saw what a refuge for extremists on the other side of the
world could bring to the streets of our own cities." - More...
Wednesday PM - January 10, 2007
National: Dems
weigh options in responding to Bush Iraq plan By MARC SANDALOW
- Democrats in Congress almost universally oppose President Bush's
plan to escalate troop levels in Iraq. The question is what they
will do to stop it.
Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.,
introduced a measure Tuesday that would require congressional
approval for Bush to increase the number of U.S. troops, which
is now 130,000 to 140,000. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California
suggested over the weekend that the House might refuse to approve
those portions of the Pentagon's budget that were directly tied
to increasing the number of troops in Iraq.
Yet most Democrats appeared
to be settling on a more cautious route, seeking a way to oppose
an escalation without looking like they are abandoning the troops,
let alone taking ownership of a war that has been a political
disaster for Republicans - More...
Wednesday PM - January 10, 2007
|
Alaska: Alaska
a hot topic in San Francisco By NED ROZELL - While trolling
the poster sessions at the Moscone Center in San Francisco during
the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting (attended by more
than 13,000 scientists), a person bumps into a great deal of
information on Alaska. Here are some notes from the legal pad:
The collapse of a portion
of Mount Steller may have been caused by mysterious water flow
through snow and ice high on the 10,000-foot peak.
Ruedi Homberger photo, courtesy of Ultima Thule Lodge.
In September 2005, a massive
rock avalanche on a remote mountain peak registered on seismometers
all over Alaska. Earthquakes sometimes rattle steep mountains
and cause avalanches, but no earthquake preceded the collapse
on Mount Steller, located about 80 miles east of Cordova. A scientist
may have found the trigger for the rock and snowslide that fell
about 8,000 feet, sheared off a glacier on the way down, and
spewed black rock that extended six miles from the mountain.
A year after the event, Bruce Molnia, a glaciologist with the
U.S. Geological Survey in Reston, Virginia, was looking at aerial
photos of Mount Steller and saw a hole in the surviving ice face
that didn't fall from the top of the mountain. The ice cave is
the mouth of a channel that probably held running water, Molnia
said.
"You don't get 30-meter holes on top of a mountain without
water flowing down," Molnia said.
Looking at the photos of Mount Steller and nearby peaks, Molnia
also saw evidence of two more water channels above other avalanche
sites. Somehow, he said, large amounts of water are flowing through
ice and snow at high altitudes in the area.
"(The avalanches) all seem to have an unusual meltwater
trigger," he said. "How can you get so much meltwater
at 3,000 meters?" - More...
Wednesday - January 10, 2007
|
Columns - Commentary
Dave
Kiffer: Dousing
a Dangerous Development - The petty dictators of airplane
discipline gave travelers an early Christmas present recently
by allowing us to take water on plane flights again.
Water had been banned you remember
because it was dangerous. At least that was the theory.
Some really clever miscreants
in Britain had been foiled in their attempt to create some sort
of water-based bombs and blow up a whole bunch of airplanes.
Therefore we were forced to hand over our Dasanis and Purple
Mountains at the gate
Good thing too. The beverage
service on flights was getting so bad that people were BYOBing
so much liquid that the overhead bins were getting too full of
spritzer and airline toilets were flushing so often that it was
a challenge keeping the planes aloft. - More...
Tuesday - January 09, 2007
Jay
Ambrose: President
Bush, the stealth humanitarian - Whether it's helping get
the homeless into homes, fighting malaria and other diseases
in Africa or spending on U.S. poverty programs, President Bush
is breaking records - and getting no credit for it.
You might say he's a stealth
humanitarian, someone whose heartlessness is constantly preached
while his accomplishments are persistently ignored.
But then you stumble on the
Bush ambition regarding chronic homelessness. He wants to end
it, and the consequences of administration efforts to date are
amazing - significant percentage drops in such cities as San
Francisco, Philadelphia, Miami, Dallas, Denver and Portland,
Ore.
The basic idea of the program
being endlessly advocated by a Bush appointee, Philip Mangano,
is for cities to combine federal, local and charitable funds
to put the chronically homeless into their own apartments and
assist them with social services instead of dealing with them
piecemeal so they too often end up in jails, hospitals and other
facilities. As various news accounts explain, you save money
this way, but here's the real gold: You save lives. - More...
Tuesday - January 09, 2007
Dale
McFeatters: Lawmakers
in search of self-restraint - The House, it turned out, was
serious about ethics reform; the Senate perhaps less so.
The House banned a number of
lobbyist-provided benefits that many lawmakers seemed to have
come to think of perks of their office - gifts, meals, travel,
the use of corporate jets. It did not venture into the trickier,
more ambiguous world of lobbyists doing political fund-raising.
The most significant reform
involved earmarks - lawmakers' personal pork projects often quietly
slipped into spending bills in the dead of night and often done
so at the behest of a generous lobbyist.
The projects might themselves
be fine, even worthwhile. The problem is that no congressional
panel has scrutinized them for their merit or relative priority
in a tight budget. A particular project may be a laughable waste
of money, but usually it doesn't come to light until too late,
after the bill has been passed. - More...
Tuesday - January 09, 2007
Martin
Schram: There's
a huge loophole being left in ethics reforms - Nothing is
as deceptively euphoric as Washington in full flower. And in
the first days of 2007, the cherry trees, the Congress and the
idiots of the nation's capital were all blossoming.
We saw the blooming cherry
trees - a result of botanical confusion that 70-degree winter
days meant spring had sprung.
We saw the blooming of a new
Congress - as in the first hours of the first day, Democrats
made a show of rushing ethics reforms through the House they
now control. By a vote of 430-1, as still-embarrassed Republicans
had no choice but to go with the flow, the House members voted
to ban themselves from taking freebees from lobbyists - no meals,
gifts or travel. It was a morality show designed to demonstrate
that the evils and abuses symbolized by Tom DeLay's pal Jack
Abramoff are now ancient history.
Then we heard the blooming
idiots. They were the pols, pundits and think-tank denizens who
gushed that these showy ethics flourishes, once adopted by the
Senate, will fundamentally change the craft of politics in the
nation's capital. But, in fact, it will fundamentally change
nothing. Because it misses the main point about how Washington
really works. - More...
Tuesday - January 09, 2007
|
|
|
|