Contact
News
Tips
Search Sitnews
Copyright Info
Archives
Today's
News
Alaska & Ketchikan
Top Stories
U.S. News
U.S. Politics
Stock Watch
Personal Finance
Science News
US Education News
Parenting News
Seniors News
Medical News
Health News
Fitness
Offbeat News
Online Auction News
Today In History
Product Recalls
Obituaries
Quick News
Search
SitNews
Alaska
Ketchikan
SE Alaska
Alaska News Links
Columns
- Articles
Dave Kiffer
Ketchikan
Arts
& Entertainment
June
Allen
Jason Love
Fish
Factor
Louise Harrington
Bob Ciminel
Chemical Eye
On...
Match
of the Month
Rob
Holston
More Columnists
Ketchikan
Our Troops
Historical
Ketchikan
June Allen
Dave Kiffer
Pioneers of Southeast
Ketchikan
Arts & Events
Arts
This Week
Ketchikan
Museums
KTN
Public Library
Friday Night Insight
Parks & Recreation
Chamber
Lifestyles
Home & Garden
Food & Drink
Arts & Culture
Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
Celebrity Gossip
On the Web
Cool Sites
Webmaster Tips
Virus Warnings
Sports
Ketchikan Links
Top Sports News
Public Records
FAA Accident Reports
NTSB
Accident Reports
Court Calendar
Court Records Search
Wanted: Absconders
Sex Offender Reg.
Public Notices
Weather,
Webcams
Today's
Forecast
KTN Weather
Data
AK
Weather Map
Ketchikan
Webcam
SE AK Webcams
Alaska Webcams
AK Earthquakes
Earthquakes
TV Guide
Ketchikan
Ketchikan
Phone Book
Yellow
Pages
White
Pages
Employment
Employment
Government
KTN Consolidation
LBC - Ketchikan
Local Government
State & National
|
Friday
September 08, 2006
Ketchikan As Viewed From Pacific
Airways
Front Page Photo by Elizabeth E. Harrison
National: BP
official refuses to testify at pipeline hearing By RICHARD
MAUER - The first of at least four congressional hearings into
why BP failed to prevent pipeline failures on Alaska's North
Slope began dramatically Thursday when Richard Woollam, the company's
corrosion chief until 2005, refused to testify, citing his Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination.
In a day marked with blistering
criticism of BP from Republicans and Democrats on the House Energy
and Commerce Committee, the British-born Woollam, derided in
an internal BP report as "King Richard" for his dictatorial
style, refused to answer any questions.
The committee's investigations
panel is looking into the failure of BP to monitor and control
corrosion on two smaller North Slope transit pipelines that feed
the main trans-Alaska pipeline.
One of those lines had a catastrophic
leak on March 2, spilling more than 200,000 gallons of oil in
the tundra and the ice-locked shore of an unnamed lake. The other
line had a smaller leak in August. Unsure of the reliability
of either line, BP announced it would shut down all North Slope
production Aug. 6, then limited the closure to the field's eastern
half.
Over and over, the committee
members grilled BP Exploration (Alaska) President Steve Marshall
about why BP neglected to conduct the only reliable test of the
decay of an entire pipeline, a "smart pig" that travels
inside the pipe and records the thickness of the wall along its
length.
Marshall replied that the company
thought the line wasn't as susceptible to corrosion as others.
The last smart pig run on the western line was in 1998 and on
the eastern line in 1992.
But was it just an error in
judgment, or was something else at work, the committee wanted
to know. Was BP shaving costs to increase profits? Were executives
trying to beef up their annual bonuses by meeting budgets regardless
of the consequences? Committee chairman Joe Barton, R-Texas,
wondered aloud whether BP was "betting the farm" that
the Prudhoe Bay field would run out before the pipeline failed,
saving the costs of replacing it.
"Shame, shame, shame,"
he said. - More...
Friday - September 08, 2006
International: Analysts
call new Iraq military a work in progress By JOHN KOOPMAN
- The last time an Iraqi Army division was under the control
of the Iraqi government, back in 2003, American soldiers were
chasing it and trying to kill its soldiers.
But this week the Iraqi government
officially took control over one army division and a handful
of boats and airplanes belonging to the navy and air force.
The handover "is an important
milestone, but we still have a way to go," said Gen. George
Casey, the top U.S. general in Iraq.
Military analysts interviewed
about the handover agreed on both of those points, but they focused
more on the latter.
"A lot of this is just
rhetoric," said Anthony Cordesman, a Middle East expert
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington
think tank. "It's all part of a process to give the Iraqi
forces more visibility, more confidence and, hopefully, give
the government more leverage in terms of its ability to influence
political compromise."
|
"The question is, who are the Iraqi troops loyal to and
what are their capabilities? And what does this say about internal
security?" said Tom Mockaitis, a professor of history at
De Paul University whose focus is counterinsurgencies. "At
this point, I don't see much more than a symbolic gesture."
Handing over the 8th Iraqi
Division means the unit will operate under the command and control
of the Defense Ministry and, above it, the prime minister. The
other nine divisions remain under the control of U.S. military
units in their respective areas of operations. - More...
Friday - September 08, 2006
Alaska: Alaska
Department of Law and U.S. Department of Justice Submit Demand
Letter to ExxonMobil for $92 Million - Alaska Attorney General
David Márquez announced that the State of Alaska, Department
of Law and the U.S. Department of Justice submitted a letter
to ExxonMobil Corporation demanding payment of $92,240,982 pursuant
to the reopener provisions of the October 1991 settlement involving
the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
In an earlier letter dated
May 31, 2006 the two governments presented ExxonMobil with a
Comprehensive Plan for Habitat Restoration Project Pursuant
to Reopener for Unknown Injury
("Comprehensive Plan"), estimated to cost this
amount, to address certain remaining injuries from the oil spill.
"We believe the Comprehensive
Plan satisfies the requirements of the reopener provision and
is built upon a foundation and commitment to sound science,"
said Márquez. - More...
Friday - September 08, 2006
Ketchikan: Ketchikan
Selected to Host the 25th Anniversary Colgate Country Showdown
in Alaska - This year the Colgate Country Showdown, America's
largest country music talent search, is coming to Ketchikan.
The event will be held at the VFW on September 23rd. Each year
thousands of contestants of all ages take the stage to demonstrate
their talent, and in many cases perform their own original music.
The Showdown is not a reality series or a show audition; it is
a true talent contest. Winners are chosen by music industry professionals
using a uniform judging criteria on all levels. Over 400 shows
are produced annually at fairs, theme parks, casinos and clubs
throughout the United States. Over $300,000 in cash prizes are
awarded to contestants, including the Grand Prize of $100,000.
If you have musical talent this year's 25th Anniversary Colgate
Country Showdown is the place to start.
The Colgate Country Showdown
has become a tradition for scores of towns and cities across
America. Over 450 local radio stations are chosen to host the
Showdowns every year creating a genuine source of community pride
as fans eagerly anticipate their annual Colgate Country Showdown.
This year Ketchikan's own Gateway Country will have the honor
of being Alaska s exclusive hosting station. Built on the concept
of wholesome family entertainment, event producers take pride
in a yearly event that pays tribute to their hometown talent
and each year over 50,000 artists sign up. As a testament to
this fact, virtually every major country music entertainer of
the past twenty years has participated in the Showdown. They
may not have won the Grand Prize, but it was often the first
time they experienced the thrill of performing before a live
audience. - More...
Friday - September 08, 2006
|
Columns - Commentary
Dick
Morris and Eileen McGann: Neither
Side Deserves To Be Reelected - Sorry, but you don't.
At the start of Congress, right
after Bush's reelection, two topics dominated your agenda: Social
Security and Immigration Reform. Neither passed.
Congress punted on Social Security
after it got scared to death by the reaction of senior citizens
to Bush's proposed reforms. Ironically, the group least affected
by the changes - the elderly who were exempt from their provisions
- was the most opposed. And the people directly impacted - current
wage earners - were largely supportive, albeit apathetic. Democrats
never got to stop the reforms by waging the gallant filibuster
for which they were hoping. The Republicans quietly killed Bush's
proposals by an agreement never to talk about them again. - More...
Thursday - September 07, 2006
Clifford
D. May -
Five years later: It's time to unite and fight - Five years
after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Americans have
not been slaughtered a second time on U.S. soil. That is no small
achievement. It has come about not because our enemies have been
merciful or because they consider our behavior improved. It has
come about because we have begun to understand that we have enemies,
that they pose a serious threat, and that we must fight them.
Most Americans did not comprehend
that on Sept. 10, 2001. When the Cold War ended with a whimper,
we wanted to believe peace would prevail. We shrank the military
and encouraged the intelligence community to give up such unsavory
practices as running spies, sparking coups and making life dangerous
for despots. - More...
Thursday - September 07, 2006
Reg Henry: Fear
is an easier sell than sacrifice - I wish I had a nickel
for every time I have heard people like me (i.e., supposedly
unpatriotic ingrates) reminded that "we are at war."
I would buy my critics a set of medals from the wars they never
went to or a set of history books about wars they don't remember.
What do these guys mean when
they say "we are at war"? What they really mean is
that they want anyone who expresses doubt about the war in Iraq,
in particular, to shut up.
"We are at war" translates
into "you can't argue with the commander in chief when we
are at war," which, conveniently for him, won't ever end.
- More...
Thursday - September 07, 2006
Ann
McFeatters:
A blurred vision of war - For the rest of our lives, "9/11"
will haunt us, evoking a rush of fear, anger and grief. But now
the issue is what the impact will be on unborn Americans.
President Bush's determination
to tie the war in Iraq more firmly to the war on terror is a
calculation born of frustration and stubbornness. In the run
up to the fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, warning us against
getting "stuck on stupid," Bush quoted terrorist Osama
bin Laden, who still eludes capture, as saying that the third
world war is raging in Iraq.
The implication is that if
America "loses" in Iraq, although what a "win"
would constitute has never been adequately defined, America will
lose a major battle against terrorism, even the "third world
war." - More...
Thursday - September 07, 2006
Michael
Reagan:
A Little Straight Talk Wouldn't Hurt - Listening to the Democrats
complain Tuesday about the administration's handling of the nation's
security had me thinking. If, as they charge, the president is
using it as a political issue, I really hope he is.
I also thought that President
Bush needs to stop preaching to the choir - to his rock hard
supporters - and begin to speak to all the American people about
just what's at stake in the war on terror.
He needs to tell Americans
flat out exactly where the Democrats stand on national security.
They oppose the wiretaps of al Qaeda terrorists communicating
with agents and sympathizers in the U.S.; they are opposed to
the tracking of the movement of terrorist funds across the globe,
they opposed the Patriot Act - all programs that are designed
to protect the American people. - More..
Thursday - September 07, 2006
Jay
Ambrose: Conspiracies
everywhere - Listen up, America, and listen good. There is
a conspiracy going on to boost the Bush administration and undermine
large numbers of Internet bloggers and even some university professors
by having you believe these people are making ding-a-ling claims
about 9/11.
The conspirators - and I am
pretty sure I know who you are - have somehow managed to get
actors to pose as critics of the Bush administration on Web sites,
in press interviews and on TV panel discussions. Instead of saying
sensible things about possible mishandling of the terrorist threat,
they say there is no terrorist threat. They say the downing of
the Twin Towers was an inside job possibly committed by neo-conservatives,
perhaps under government direction, and even that it was a cruise
missile that hit the Pentagon, not a commercial jetliner. - More...
Thursday - September 07, 2006
Dale
McFeatters: 'War
on terror' week - This past week has been "war on terror"
week in the nation's capital, with President Bush holding almost
daily events highlighting progress in GWOT, the global war on
terror now having its own acronym.
It was almost like old-home
week. The almost-forgotten Osama bin Laden made a big-time appearance
in Bush's speeches, being mentioned 16 times in one and appearing
in such heady company in the world of evildoers as Hitler and
Lenin.
We tend to forget about bin
Laden except when his minions drop off one of his incoherent
audiotapes at al-Jazeera and we're reminded that the old boy
hasn't given up his dreams of restoring the caliphate in the
Mideast with himself presumably as caliph. - More...
Thursday - September 07, 2006
|
|
|
|