| 
                  
                   National: Conspiracy
                  theories propel radio show into Top 10 By DELFIN VIGIL -
                  There was a time when "Coast to Coast AM," the late-night
                  syndicated talk radio show dedicated to paranormal activities
                  and political conspiracies, didn't get much respect. 
                  "At one point it was,
                  'Oh, that strange show about weird paranormal things?' "
                  said George Noory, who has hosted the program on weeknights from
                  10 p.m. to 2 a.m. PST full time since 2003. 
                  That all changed when millions
                  from the mainstream met up with the after-midnight fringe folks
                  to make "Coast to Coast AM" a top-rated radio show. 
                  The show that gives self-described
                  vampires a place to vent on its Friday night Wild Card line is
                  the same one that was taking calls about Sept. 11 conspiracy
                  theories just two weeks after the terrorist attacks. And "Coast
                  to Coast AM," is the same show that can now reach upward
                  of 3 million listeners through 500 stations each week, according
                  to Premiere Radio Networks, the company that syndicates the show. 
                  "There's absolutely a
                  growing conspiracy climate," said Noory, explaining the
                  phenomenon of numbers typically unheard of for that time slot.
                  "People are tired of being misled and confused from taking
                  information directly from a government official. After a while,
                  it becomes almost like a pressure cooker that needs to let off
                  steam." - More... 
                  Monday - November 13, 2006 
                  Columns - Commentary
                   Jay
                  Ambrose: Good
                  decision on Rumsfeld - In my school days, it was often the
                  best teachers my classmates most disliked, the ones who required
                  you to learn no matter how much work it took, quickly caught
                  on to your tricks and put up with no nonsense. 
                  The less demanding teachers
                  - those most inclined to let your mind go mushy on their watch
                  - were frequently the ones more celebrated. 
                  My suspicion is that some similar
                  desire for comfort over excellence is a reason many in the Pentagon
                  didn't much care for Donald Rumsfeld, a secretary of defense
                  with a noted intolerance for generals who came calling with nothing
                  important to say and for bureaucratically espoused military strategies
                  that made increasingly less sense in our rapidly changing world. 
                  Even if that is so - and even
                  if Rumsfeld became a scapegoat for mistakes that were not his
                  doing and the sort of setbacks that were his responsibility but
                  are also encountered in virtually every war ever fought - President
                  Bush was right to announce his replacement, and to do it when
                  he did it, the day after it became known Democrats were to regain
                  control of Congress. During their campaigns, Democrats told the
                  voters that the war in Iraq was an ungodly mess, and on Election
                  Day, the voters told the Democrats, "We agree." - More... 
                  Monday - November 13, 2006 
                   Michael
                  Reagan: Republicans
                  Lost Because They Lost Their Way - We are hearing all sorts
                  of reasons why the GOP got, in George Bush's word, "thumped."
                  We're told it was Iraq, or that it was the incompetence and corruption
                  of some of its members. Some cited the unpopularity of the president,
                  implying that it rubbed off on the House members who went down
                  to defeat last Tuesday. 
                  While there is some validity
                  to all these complaints, they miss the mark by ignoring the real
                  cause of the Nov. 7 electoral disaster  the fact that Republicans
                  had stopped acting the way Republicans are meant to act, and
                  began acting as clones of big-government, big-spending Democrats. 
                  In September of last year I
                  wrote that unless congressional Republicans put the break on
                  spending "you can bet that the Republican Party is going
                  to lose control of Congress next year, and with Democrats in
                  power government spending will go through the roof." 
                  In 1994 the Republicans took
                  control of Capitol Hill, mostly on the strength of the Contract
                  with America. Over time that contract with America turned into
                  the contract on America. - More... 
                  Monday - November 13, 2006 
                   Dale
                  McFeatters: Democrats:
                  OK, let's see you do it - Groping for some solace out of
                  last week's voter slap down, some Republicans are saying that
                  this defeat may be in the long-term best interests of their party.
                  They reason that after two years of Democratic control of Congress
                  a chastened electorate will come sobbing back to the Republicans. 
                  They reason that the Democrats
                  won't be able to control their party's special interests, unruly
                  ideologues and rabid anti-Bush partisans. And there may be something
                  to that; at least some Democrats think so too. 
                  That's perhaps why Speaker-in-waiting
                  Nancy Pelosi so forcefully spiked the boneheaded notion of some
                  of her followers that President Bush ought to be censured and
                  even impeached. - More... 
                  Monday - November 13, 2006 
                   John
                  Crisp: Hanging
                  Saddam is an ironic step backwards - Saddam is sentenced
                  to hang, and few are more deserving of that fate. The case is
                  problematic, though. During the course of the trial, three of
                  Saddam's lawyers were assassinated, the judge had to be replaced,
                  and tiresome polemical tirades of various kinds were permitted. 
                  Furthermore, while the trial
                  proceeded, Iraq was coming apart at the seams. The authority
                  of the judiciary was undermined in the minds of many Iraqis by
                  the questionable legitimacy of the government. In the background
                  was the Bush administration, which has forcefully and publicly
                  contended that Saddam is guilty. It had an obvious stake in the
                  outcome of his trial, which happened to conclude just a few days
                  before our election. 
                  Ultimately, the verdict was
                  correct and just, but the trial was a mess. And real justice
                  should always have the appearance of careful deliberation and
                  impartiality. This one just doesn't pass the smell test. - More... 
                  Monday - November 13, 2006
                  |