National: Conspiracy
theories propel radio show into Top 10 By DELFIN VIGIL -
There was a time when "Coast to Coast AM," the late-night
syndicated talk radio show dedicated to paranormal activities
and political conspiracies, didn't get much respect.
"At one point it was,
'Oh, that strange show about weird paranormal things?' "
said George Noory, who has hosted the program on weeknights from
10 p.m. to 2 a.m. PST full time since 2003.
That all changed when millions
from the mainstream met up with the after-midnight fringe folks
to make "Coast to Coast AM" a top-rated radio show.
The show that gives self-described
vampires a place to vent on its Friday night Wild Card line is
the same one that was taking calls about Sept. 11 conspiracy
theories just two weeks after the terrorist attacks. And "Coast
to Coast AM," is the same show that can now reach upward
of 3 million listeners through 500 stations each week, according
to Premiere Radio Networks, the company that syndicates the show.
"There's absolutely a
growing conspiracy climate," said Noory, explaining the
phenomenon of numbers typically unheard of for that time slot.
"People are tired of being misled and confused from taking
information directly from a government official. After a while,
it becomes almost like a pressure cooker that needs to let off
steam." - More...
Monday - November 13, 2006
Columns - Commentary
Jay
Ambrose: Good
decision on Rumsfeld - In my school days, it was often the
best teachers my classmates most disliked, the ones who required
you to learn no matter how much work it took, quickly caught
on to your tricks and put up with no nonsense.
The less demanding teachers
- those most inclined to let your mind go mushy on their watch
- were frequently the ones more celebrated.
My suspicion is that some similar
desire for comfort over excellence is a reason many in the Pentagon
didn't much care for Donald Rumsfeld, a secretary of defense
with a noted intolerance for generals who came calling with nothing
important to say and for bureaucratically espoused military strategies
that made increasingly less sense in our rapidly changing world.
Even if that is so - and even
if Rumsfeld became a scapegoat for mistakes that were not his
doing and the sort of setbacks that were his responsibility but
are also encountered in virtually every war ever fought - President
Bush was right to announce his replacement, and to do it when
he did it, the day after it became known Democrats were to regain
control of Congress. During their campaigns, Democrats told the
voters that the war in Iraq was an ungodly mess, and on Election
Day, the voters told the Democrats, "We agree." - More...
Monday - November 13, 2006
Michael
Reagan: Republicans
Lost Because They Lost Their Way - We are hearing all sorts
of reasons why the GOP got, in George Bush's word, "thumped."
We're told it was Iraq, or that it was the incompetence and corruption
of some of its members. Some cited the unpopularity of the president,
implying that it rubbed off on the House members who went down
to defeat last Tuesday.
While there is some validity
to all these complaints, they miss the mark by ignoring the real
cause of the Nov. 7 electoral disaster the fact that Republicans
had stopped acting the way Republicans are meant to act, and
began acting as clones of big-government, big-spending Democrats.
In September of last year I
wrote that unless congressional Republicans put the break on
spending "you can bet that the Republican Party is going
to lose control of Congress next year, and with Democrats in
power government spending will go through the roof."
In 1994 the Republicans took
control of Capitol Hill, mostly on the strength of the Contract
with America. Over time that contract with America turned into
the contract on America. - More...
Monday - November 13, 2006
Dale
McFeatters: Democrats:
OK, let's see you do it - Groping for some solace out of
last week's voter slap down, some Republicans are saying that
this defeat may be in the long-term best interests of their party.
They reason that after two years of Democratic control of Congress
a chastened electorate will come sobbing back to the Republicans.
They reason that the Democrats
won't be able to control their party's special interests, unruly
ideologues and rabid anti-Bush partisans. And there may be something
to that; at least some Democrats think so too.
That's perhaps why Speaker-in-waiting
Nancy Pelosi so forcefully spiked the boneheaded notion of some
of her followers that President Bush ought to be censured and
even impeached. - More...
Monday - November 13, 2006
John
Crisp: Hanging
Saddam is an ironic step backwards - Saddam is sentenced
to hang, and few are more deserving of that fate. The case is
problematic, though. During the course of the trial, three of
Saddam's lawyers were assassinated, the judge had to be replaced,
and tiresome polemical tirades of various kinds were permitted.
Furthermore, while the trial
proceeded, Iraq was coming apart at the seams. The authority
of the judiciary was undermined in the minds of many Iraqis by
the questionable legitimacy of the government. In the background
was the Bush administration, which has forcefully and publicly
contended that Saddam is guilty. It had an obvious stake in the
outcome of his trial, which happened to conclude just a few days
before our election.
Ultimately, the verdict was
correct and just, but the trial was a mess. And real justice
should always have the appearance of careful deliberation and
impartiality. This one just doesn't pass the smell test. - More...
Monday - November 13, 2006
|